Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Atom C2730

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2730

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.7 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 8 vs 2 6 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Jun, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Slightly lower typical power consumption 9.75W vs 13.81W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.89 $/year vs 4.1 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 10.51 $/year vs 14.89 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron 847  vs Atom C2730 

clock speed

Celeron 847
1.1 GHz
Atom C2730
1.7 GHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron 847
1.1 GHz
Atom C2730
2.4 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron 847
1.1 GHz
Atom C2730
2.4 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
Atom C2730 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Octa core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 17W 12W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 2.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 10.51 $/year
Typical power consumption 13.81W 9.75W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron 847  vs
Atom C2730 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 8
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 97°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.1 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.1 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 800 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 16,384 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2730
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus