CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 847 vs 330 among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron 847 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 847  based on its features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Atom 330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom 330

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom 330 vs the Celeron 847.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs Atom 330

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,460
Atom 330
955

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
54,500 MB/s
Atom 330
25,200 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,405
Atom 330
873

GeekBench

Celeron 847
2,817
Atom 330
873

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Atom 330
824.5

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
Atom 330 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
437

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 17W 8W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 1.93 $/year
Performance per watt 3.23 pt/W 3.77 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 6.5W

details

Celeron 847  vs
Atom 330 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 12
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 85.2°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.1 GHz 2.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.1 GHz 2.05 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 800 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
Intel Atom 330
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus