Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Turion X2 72

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion X2 72

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion X2 72 vs the Intel Celeron 847.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs Turion X2 72

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
Turion X2 72 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron 847  vs
Turion X2 72 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.98 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.49 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 800 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 17W 35W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 3.23 pt/W 1.61 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 28.44W
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
AMD Turion X2 72
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus