Intel Celeron 847 vs AMD Sempron 130 |
Released June, 2011
Intel Celeron 847
- 1.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron 847
 | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | More l2 cache 1 MB |
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W | | More cores 2 |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 130
- 2.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 130
| | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 98,400 MB/s | | Much higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.73 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 13.81W | vs | 36.56W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Better performance per watt | 3.23 pt/W | vs | 1.73 pt/W | More than 85% better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | vs | 10.84 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | vs | 39.42 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 98,400 MB/s | vs | 54,500 MB/s | More than 80% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.73 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | Around 3.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs Sempron 130
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 847 | vs | Sempron 130 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Celeron 847 | vs | Sempron 130 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 3.73 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.1 GHz | 3.73 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.23 pt/W | 1.73 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 36.56W | |
 Intel Celeron 847  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 130 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $134 | |
| 1007U vs 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $42 | $134 | |
| N2600 vs 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | $134 | |
| J1800 vs 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $63 | $134 | |
| D525 vs 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | ||
| 350 vs 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $134 | |
| 1037U vs 847 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
