Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 36.56W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 3.23 pt/W vs 1.73 pt/W More than 85% better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 10.84 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 39.42 $/year 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Sempron 130

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 130

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 98,400 MB/s vs 54,500 MB/s More than 80% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 2.2x higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.73 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 3.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs Sempron 130

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,460
Sempron 130
1,141

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
54,500 MB/s
Sempron 130
98,400 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
Sempron 130 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron 847  vs
Sempron 130 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.1 GHz 3.73 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 2.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.1 GHz 3.73 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 45W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 3.23 pt/W 1.73 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 36.56W
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 130
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus