0 Comments
| Intel Celeron 847 vs AMD Sempron 130 |
Released June, 2011
Intel Celeron 847
- 1.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron 847
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | More l2 cache 1 MB |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W | ![]() | More cores 2 |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 130
- 2.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 130
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 98,400 MB/s | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.73 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 13.81W | vs | 36.56W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better performance per watt | 3.23 pt/W | vs | 1.73 pt/W | More than 85% better performance per watt | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | vs | 10.84 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | vs | 39.42 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 98,400 MB/s | vs | 54,500 MB/s | More than 80% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Much higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.73 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | Around 3.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs Sempron 130
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 847
1,460
Sempron 130
1,141
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 847
878
Sempron 130
1,147
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 847
54,500 MB/s
Sempron 130
98,400 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron 847
938
Sempron 130
656
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron 847
539
Sempron 130
714
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 847 | vs | Sempron 130 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Celeron 847 | vs | Sempron 130 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 3.73 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.1 GHz | 3.73 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 45W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.23 pt/W | 1.73 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 36.56W |
Intel Celeron 847 ![]() | AMD Sempron 130 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $134 | |
N2600 vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $134 | |
1007U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $134 | |
1037U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
350 vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $134 | |
J1800 vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $134 | |
D525 vs 847 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||