Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 54,500 MB/s vs 54.4 MB/s More than 1001.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 77.19W 5.6x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 67 °C Around 50% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jun, 2011 vs Apr, 2005 Release date over 6 years later
Better performance per watt 3.23 pt/W vs 0.68 pt/W More than 4.8x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 5.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 5.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 870

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 870

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 80% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,525 vs 1,460 More than 3x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs Opteron 870

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,460
Opteron 870
4,525

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
54,500 MB/s
Opteron 870
54.4 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
Opteron 870 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
940

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron 847  vs
Opteron 870 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 8
Clock multiplier 11 10
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C 0 - 67°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.1 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.1 GHz 2 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 95W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 3.23 pt/W 0.68 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 77.19W
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 870
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus