Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Opteron 61-1

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 61-1

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
More l3 cache 10 MB vs 2 MB 5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 8 vs 2 6 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
More l3 cache per core 1.25 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core

Features Key features of the Celeron 847  vs Opteron 61-1 

clock speed

Celeron 847
1.1 GHz
Opteron 61-1
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
Opteron 61-1 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Octa core
Socket type
BGA 1023
G34

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron 847  vs
Opteron 61-1 
Threads 2 8
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 10 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 4

power consumption

Typical power consumption 13.81W N/A

bus

Architecture DMI HyperTransport 3.0
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 61-1
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus