Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jun, 2011 vs May, 2004 Release date over 7 years later
Better performance per watt 3.23 pt/W vs 0.48 pt/W More than 6.8x better performance per watt
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 20.31W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 95 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 6.02 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 21.9 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Geode NX 1750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Geode NX 1750

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.92 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs Geode NX 1750

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
Geode NX 1750 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron 847  vs
Geode NX 1750 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 95°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.92 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.1 GHz 1.92 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 25W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 3.23 pt/W 0.48 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 20.31W
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
AMD Geode NX 1750
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus