Winner
Intel Celeron 847
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 847 based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details Intel Celeron 847 vs AMD E 450 |
Released June, 2011
Intel Celeron 847
- 1.1 GHz
- Dual core
8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron 847
 | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 23.4 | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
| | Significantly better turbo clock speed 800 MHz | | Better geekbench 3 AES single core score 54,500 MB/s |
VS
Released August, 2011
AMD E 450
- 1.65 GHz
- Dual core
7.4 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD E 450
| | Higher clock speed 1.65 GHz | | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 508 MHz |
| | Better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 0.14 fps | | Newer Aug, 2011 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 847 vs 450 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron 847CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 23.4 | vs | 18.4 | More than 25% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly better turbo clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 35% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 54,500 MB/s | vs | 53,200 MB/s | Almost the same | |||
| Significantly more l3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 90 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.65 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 508 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | More than 45% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | 0.14 fps | vs | 0.09 fps | Around 65% better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | |||
| Newer | Aug, 2011 | vs | Jun, 2011 | Release date 2 months later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs E 450
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 847 | vs | E 450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
| Super 7 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
details | Celeron 847 | vs | E 450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 40 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 11 | 25 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 508 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 800 MHz | 600 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.23 pt/W | 2.98 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 14.63W | |
 Intel Celeron 847  Report a correction |  AMD E 450 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $42 | $134 | |
| Intel Atom N2600 vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $134 | |
| Intel Celeron 1007U vs 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | ||
| AMD E 350 vs Intel Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $134 | |
| Intel Celeron 1037U vs 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs AMD E 450 | ||
| | VS | |
| AMD E 350 vs 450 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
| | VS | |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
