CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 847 vs 450 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron 847 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 847  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 23.4 vs 18.4 More than 25% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better turbo clock speed 800 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 35% better turbo clock speed
Better geekbench 3 AES single core score 54,500 MB/s vs 53,200 MB/s Almost the same
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.65 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 508 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 45% higher GPU clock speed
Better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 0.14 fps vs 0.09 fps Around 65% better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Jun, 2011 Release date 2 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs E 450

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 847
0.09 fps
E 450
0.14 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,460
E 450
1,127

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 450
642

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
54,500 MB/s
E 450
53,200 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,405
E 450
1,056

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,596
E 450
1,181

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 450
770

PassMark (Single Core)

E 450
431

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
E 450 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.65 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
Super 7

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details

Celeron 847  vs
E 450 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 25
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 508 MHz
Turbo clock speed 800 MHz 600 MHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 18W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 3.23 pt/W 2.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 14.63W
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
AMD E 450
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus