Winner
Intel Celeron 847
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 847 based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.
See full details | Intel Celeron 847 vs AMD E 450 |
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 23.4 | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
![]() | Significantly better turbo clock speed 800 MHz | ![]() | Better geekbench 3 AES single core score 54,500 MB/s |
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.65 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 508 MHz |
![]() | Better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 0.14 fps | ![]() | Newer Aug, 2011 |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 23.4 | vs | 18.4 | More than 25% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly better turbo clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 35% better turbo clock speed | |||
Better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 54,500 MB/s | vs | 53,200 MB/s | Almost the same | |||
Significantly more l3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l3 cache per core | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 90 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1.65 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 508 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | More than 45% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | 0.14 fps | vs | 0.09 fps | Around 65% better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | |||
Newer | Aug, 2011 | vs | Jun, 2011 | Release date 2 months later |
summary | Celeron 847 | vs | E 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
Super 7 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 |
details | Celeron 847 | vs | E 450 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 40 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 11 | 25 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 508 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 800 MHz | 600 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 18W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.23 pt/W | 2.98 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 14.63W |
Intel Celeron 847 ![]() | AMD E 450 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $134 | |
Intel Atom N2600 vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $134 | |
Intel Celeron J1800 vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $134 | |
Intel Celeron 1007U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
AMD E 350 vs Intel Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
Intel Core i3 3217U vs AMD E 450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | ||
Intel Core i5 2450M vs AMD E 450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||