CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 847 vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron 847 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 847  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron 847

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 54,500 MB/s vs 51,600 MB/s More than 5% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 30.2W 2.2x lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 90 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better performance per watt 3.23 pt/W vs 1.5 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 12 $/year 2.9x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 28.21 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jun, 2011 vs Jan, 2011 Release date 5 months later
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 24 vs 23.4 Around 5% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher GPU clock speed 492 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 40% higher GPU clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs E 350

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 847
0.09 fps
E 350
0.1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,460
E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
620

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
54,500 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,405
E 350
1,032

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,596
E 350
1,201

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

E 350
782

PassMark (Single Core)

E 350
420

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 18W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 3.23 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 30.2W

details

Celeron 847  vs
E 350 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 8
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.1 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 492 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus