CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 847 vs 5300

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PassMark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
AMD A4 5300 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A4 5300  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A4 5300

AMD A4 5300

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 70 °C Around 45% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 52.81W 3.8x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 3.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 3.8x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A4 5300

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5300

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 3x higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 723 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 2x higher GPU clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 10.06 pt/$ vs 0.4 pt/$ More than 25.2x better performance per dollar
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.35 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 4x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,267 vs 539 More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 3x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Jun, 2011 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs A4 5300

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 847
1,405
A4 5300
2,715

GeekBench

Celeron 847
2,817
A4 5300
2,715

PassMark Data courtesy PassMark

A4 5300
2,007

PassMark (Single Core) Data courtesy PassMark

A4 5300
1,267

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
A4 5300 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 65W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 7.94 pt/W 5.7 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 52.81W

details

Celeron 847  vs
A4 5300 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.1 GHz 4.35 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 3.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.1 GHz 4.35 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 723 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
AMD A4 5300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus