CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 847 vs 5300

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
AMD A4 5300 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A4 5300  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A4 5300

AMD A4 5300

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 847

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 847

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum Operating Temperature 100 °C vs 70 °C Around 45% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 52.81W 3.8x lower typical power consumption
More l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 3.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 3.8x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A4 5300

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5300

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 3x higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.34 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 4x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better performance per dollar 8.01 pt/$ vs 1.08 pt/$ Around 7.5x better performance per dollar
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,274 vs 543 More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.89 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 4.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better PassMark score 2,045 vs 980 More than 2x better PassMark score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 2,741 vs 1,391 More than 95% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Marginally newer Oct, 2012 vs Jun, 2011 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 847 vs A4 5300

GeekBench (32-bit)

Celeron 847
1,391
A4 5300
2,741

GeekBench

Celeron 847
2,817
A4 5300
2,741

Passmark (Single Core)

A4 5300
1,274

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 847  vs
A4 5300 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU GPU GPU

power consumption

TDP 17W 65W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 8.49 pt/W 6.15 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 52.81W

details

Celeron 847  vs
A4 5300 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.1 GHz 4.34 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 4.89 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.1 GHz 4.34 GHz
Intel Celeron 847
Report a correction
AMD A4 5300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus