Intel Celeron 807UE vs Atom N2800 |
Released October, 2011
Intel Celeron 807UE
- 1 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron 807UE
 | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Released December, 2011
Intel Atom N2800
- 1.86 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom N2800
| | Significantly higher clock speed 1.86 GHz | | Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB |
| | Much higher GPU clock speed 640 MHz | | Much better performance per dollar 0.73 pt/$ |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1.86 GHz | vs | 1 GHz | More than 85% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 640 MHz | vs | 350 MHz | Around 85% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 0.73 pt/$ | vs | 0.29 pt/$ | More than 2.5x better performance per dollar | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.87 GHz | vs | 1 GHz | More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better performance per watt | 5.28 pt/W | vs | 3.04 pt/W | Around 75% better performance per watt | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.87 GHz | vs | 1 GHz | More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Dec, 2011 | vs | Oct, 2011 | Release date 2 months later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 807UE vs Atom N2800
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 807UE | vs | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 6.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 1.57 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 5.69 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.04 pt/W | 5.28 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 5.28W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 2,500 MT/s | |
details | Celeron 807UE | vs | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Integrated | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 640 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 10,666.66 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 4,997.12 MB | 4,997.12 MB | |
 Intel Celeron 807UE  Report a correction |  Intel Atom N2800 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $47 | $82 | |
| N2800 vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $47 | $43 | |
| N2800 vs C2350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $47 | $42 | |
| N2800 vs N2600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $47 | $47 | |
| N2800 vs D2550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $47 | $63 | |
| N2800 vs D525 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $47 | $134 | |
| N2800 vs 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $47 | $72 | |
| N2800 vs J1800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
