Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 807UE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 807UE

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Atom N2800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N2800

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1.86 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 640 MHz vs 350 MHz Around 85% higher GPU clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 0.73 pt/$ vs 0.29 pt/$ More than 2.5x better performance per dollar
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.87 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 5.28 pt/W vs 3.04 pt/W Around 75% better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.87 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Dec, 2011 vs Oct, 2011 Release date 2 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 807UE vs Atom N2800

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 807UE  vs
Atom N2800 
Clock speed 1 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 6.5W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 1.57 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 5.69 $/year
Performance per watt 3.04 pt/W 5.28 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 5.28W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Celeron 807UE  vs
Atom N2800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1 GHz 1.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 640 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Single Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 10,666.66 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 4,997.12 MB 4,997.12 MB
Intel Celeron 807UE
Report a correction
Intel Atom N2800
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus