Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Athlon II X3 445

AMD Athlon II X3 445

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 807UE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 807UE

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 77.19W 9.5x lower typical power consumption
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 75 °C Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.17 MB/core More than 6x more l3 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 9.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 9.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 3.04 pt/W vs 1.42 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Newer Oct, 2011 vs May, 2010 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD Athlon II X3 445

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X3 445

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 3x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.72 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 3.8x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,049 vs 407 More than 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.67 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core Around 2.8x more l2 cache per core
More cores 3 vs 1 Three times as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 2,582 vs 369 Around 7x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.88 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 4x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More threads 3 vs 1 Three times as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 807UE vs Athlon II X3 445

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 807UE  vs
Athlon II X3 445 
Clock speed 1 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Single core Tri core
Socket type
BGA 1023
AM3

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 95W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 3.04 pt/W 1.42 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 77.19W

details

Celeron 807UE  vs
Athlon II X3 445 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 3
L2 cache 0.25 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.67 MB/core
L3 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.17 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 75°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1 GHz 3.72 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 3.88 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1 GHz 3.72 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 800 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron 807UE
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X3 445
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus