Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 797

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 797

Report a correction
Higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 95 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 1.4 GHz More than 2.5x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 0.25 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache 16 MB vs 1.5 MB Around 10.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 6 vs 1 5 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 12 vs 1 11 more threads
Much more l3 cache per core 2.67 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 80% more l3 cache per core
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core

Features Key features of the Celeron 797  vs Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X 

clock speed

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 797  vs
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Single core Hexa core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0

details

Celeron 797  vs
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X 
Threads 1 12
L2 cache 0.25 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 1.5 MB 16 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 2.67 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 95°C

power consumption

Typical power consumption 13.81W N/A
Intel Celeron 797
Report a correction
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus