Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 787

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 787

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 63 °C Around 60% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 36.56W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 10.84 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 39.42 $/year 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jul, 2011 vs Dec, 2010 Release date 6 months later
Front view of AMD Sempron 150

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 150

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 3x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.06 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 3x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Celeron 787  vs Sempron 150 

clock speed

Celeron 787
1.3 GHz
Sempron 150
2.9 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron 787
0.25 MB

L3 cache

Celeron 787
1.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron 787
1.3 GHz
Sempron 150
3.87 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron 787
1.3 GHz
Sempron 150
4.06 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 787  vs
Sempron 150 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 2.9 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
AM3

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 45W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 39.42 $/year
Typical power consumption 13.81W 36.56W

details

Celeron 787  vs
Sempron 150 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 1.5 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 100°C Unknown - 63°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.3 GHz 3.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.3 GHz 4.06 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.3 GHz 3.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 950 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron 787
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 150
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus