0 Comments
| Intel Celeron 787 vs AMD Sempron 150 |
Released July, 2011
Intel Celeron 787
- 1.3 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron 787
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W |
VS
Released December, 2010
AMD Sempron 150
- 2.9 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 150
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.9 GHz | ![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.87 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 63 °C | Around 60% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 13.81W | vs | 36.56W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
More l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | vs | 10.84 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | vs | 39.42 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Jul, 2011 | vs | Dec, 2010 | Release date 6 months later | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 1.3 GHz | Around 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.87 GHz | vs | 1.3 GHz | Around 3x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.06 GHz | vs | 1.3 GHz | More than 3x better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Celeron 787 vs Sempron 150
clock speed
Celeron 787
1.3 GHz
Sempron 150
2.9 GHz
L2 cache
Celeron 787
0.25 MB
Sempron 150
1 MB
L3 cache
Celeron 787
1.5 MB
Sempron 150
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Celeron 787
1.3 GHz
Sempron 150
3.87 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Celeron 787
1.3 GHz
Sempron 150
4.06 GHz
TDP
Celeron 787
17W
Sempron 150
45W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 787 | vs | Sempron 150 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
AM3 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 45W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 14.89 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 36.56W |
details | Celeron 787 | vs | Sempron 150 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 100°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 3.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.3 GHz | 4.06 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.3 GHz | 3.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | N/A |
Intel Celeron 787 ![]() | AMD Sempron 150 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$112 | ||
150 vs 3225 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
150 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | ||
150 vs 2100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
150 vs 140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
150 vs 250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
150 vs 190 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
150 vs 145 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||