Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 787

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 787

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 2200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 2200+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.23 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Celeron 787  vs Athlon XP 2200+ 

clock speed

Celeron 787
1.3 GHz
Athlon XP 2200+
1.8 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron 787
0.25 MB
Athlon XP 2200+
0.25 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron 787
1.3 GHz
Athlon XP 2200+
2.23 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron 787
1.3 GHz
Athlon XP 2200+
1.8 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 787  vs
Athlon XP 2200+ 
Clock speed 1.3 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron 787  vs
Athlon XP 2200+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.3 GHz 2.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.3 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.3 GHz 2.23 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption 13.81W N/A
Intel Celeron 787
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 2200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus