Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 763

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 763

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 763 vs the Atom Z3735F.

Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Features Key features of the Celeron 763  vs Atom Z3735F 

clock speed

Celeron 763
1.4 GHz
Atom Z3735F
1.33 GHz

L2 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 763  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.33 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core
Socket type
BGA 956
BGA 592

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron 763  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed N/A 311 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 646 MHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 2.2W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 0.53 $/year
Typical power consumption 8.13W 1.79W
Intel Celeron 763
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3735F
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus