Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 570

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 570

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 570 vs the 560.

Front view of Intel Celeron 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 560

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 570 vs 560

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 570
93.1 MB/s
Celeron 560
85,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Celeron 570
1,722
Celeron 560
1,545

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 570  vs
560 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
478
P

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 533 MHz 533 MHz

details

Celeron 570  vs
560 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 291,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

power consumption

TDP 31W 31W
Annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year 7.47 $/year
Performance per watt 1.35 pt/W 2.2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 25.19W 25.19W
Intel Celeron 570
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 560
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus