Intel Celeron 570 vs 530 |
VS
Released September, 2007
Intel Celeron 530
- 1.73 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 530
 | Has a NX bit Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 570 vs the 530. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 570 vs 530
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 570 | vs | 530 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 1.73 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 478 | |||
| P | |||
| 479 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 31W | 30W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 7.47 $/year | 7.23 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.35 pt/W | 1.94 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 25.19W | 24.38W | |
details | Celeron 570 | vs | 530 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 291,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.27 GHz | 2.77 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.27 GHz | 1.73 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.27 GHz | 2.77 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 533 MHz | 533 MHz | |
 Intel Celeron 570  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 530 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $134 | |
| 530 vs T4400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $37 | |
| 530 vs 430 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $117 | |
| Celeron 530 vs Core i3 530 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $177 | |
| 530 vs T5500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $85 | ||
| 570 vs 5800K | ||
| | VS |  |
| 570 vs 520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 570 vs T4500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
