Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 460

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 460

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 36.56W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 10.84 $/year More than 20% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 39.42 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Sempron 145

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 145

Report a correction
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.28 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Celeron 460  vs Sempron 145 

clock speed

Celeron 460
2.4 GHz
Sempron 145
2.8 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron 460
0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron 460
3.57 GHz
Sempron 145
4.05 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron 460
2.4 GHz
Sempron 145
4.28 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 460  vs
Sempron 145 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
AM3

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 2,000 MHz

details

Celeron 460  vs
Sempron 145 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.57 GHz 4.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 4.28 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,224.2 1,763.8
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz 4.05 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 45W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 39.42 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 36.56W
Intel Celeron 460
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 145
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus