Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 3215U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 3215U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More l2 cache 0.5 MB vs 0.25 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 1900+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 1900+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP 1900+ vs the Intel Celeron 3215U.

Features Key features of the Celeron 3215U  vs Athlon XP 1900+ 

clock speed

Celeron 3215U
1.7 GHz
Athlon XP 1900+
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 3215U  vs
Athlon XP 1900+ 
Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron 3215U  vs
Athlon XP 1900+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 12.19W N/A
Intel Celeron 3215U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 1900+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus