Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 320

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 320

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.58 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Sempron 2300+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 2300+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Sempron 2300+ vs the Intel Celeron 320.

Features Key features of the Celeron 320  vs Sempron 2300+ 

clock speed

Celeron 320
2.4 GHz
Sempron 2300+
1.58 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron 320
0.25 MB
Sempron 2300+
0.25 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 320  vs
Sempron 2300+ 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.58 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No

bus

Clock speed 533 MHz 333 MHz

details

Celeron 320  vs
Sempron 2300+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 68.25W N/A
Intel Celeron 320
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 2300+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus