Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 320

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 320

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Front view of AMD A6 3500

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 3500

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 0.25 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 3 vs 1 Three times as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 3 vs 1 Three times as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 68.25W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 70.9 °C vs 67.7 °C Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron 320  vs A6 3500 

clock speed

Celeron 320
2.4 GHz
A6 3500
2.1 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron 320
0.25 MB
A6 3500
3 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 320  vs
A6 3500 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Single core Tri core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6530D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 443 MHz

details

Celeron 320  vs
A6 3500 
Threads 1 3
L2 cache 0.25 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 1,178,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 0.91 - 1.41V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.7°C Unknown - 70.9°C

power consumption

TDP 84W 65W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 52.81W
Intel Celeron 320
Report a correction
AMD A6 3500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus