Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 2955U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 2955U

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Athlon Neo 40

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon Neo 40

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon Neo 40 vs the Intel Celeron 2955U.

Features Key features of the Celeron 2955U  vs Athlon Neo 40 

clock speed

Celeron 2955U
1.4 GHz
Athlon Neo 40
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 2955U  vs
Athlon Neo 40 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron 2955U  vs
Athlon Neo 40 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label HD (Haswell) N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 15W 15W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 3.61 $/year
Typical power consumption 12.19W 12.19W
Intel Celeron 2955U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon Neo 40
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus