Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Atom D410

Intel Atom D410

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 220

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 220 vs the Atom D410.

Front view of Intel Atom D410

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D410

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 26,400 MB/s vs 48.3 MB/s More than 546.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.66 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 15.44W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2010 vs Oct, 2007 Release date over 2 years later
Better performance per watt 2.62 pt/W vs 1.24 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.67 GHz vs 1.48 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.67 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 4.58 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 16.64 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 220 vs Atom D410

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 220
48.3 MB/s
Atom D410
26,400 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 220  vs
Atom D410 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.66 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 19W 10W
Annual home energy cost 4.58 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 16.64 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 1.24 pt/W 2.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 15.44W 8.13W

details

Celeron 220  vs
Atom D410 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 105,000,000 123,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1 - 1.34V 0.8 - 1.18V

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.48 GHz 1.67 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.67 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.48 GHz 1.67 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron 220
Report a correction
Intel Atom D410
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus