Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 2002E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 2002E

Report a correction
Higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz vs 350 MHz Around 15% higher GPU clock speed
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Jan, 2013 Release date 11 months later
Front view of Intel Celeron 1037U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1037U

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% better turbo clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 20.31W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 6.02 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 21.9 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron 2002E  vs 1037U 

clock speed

Celeron 2002E
1.5 GHz
Celeron 1037U
1.8 GHz

L3 cache

gpu clock speed

Celeron 2002E
400 MHz
Celeron 1037U
350 MHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron 2002E
1.5 GHz
Celeron 1037U
1.8 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron 2002E
1.5 GHz
Celeron 1037U
1.8 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 2002E  vs
1037U 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 25W 17W
Annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.9 $/year 14.89 $/year
Typical power consumption 20.31W 13.81W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 DMI
Number of links 0 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Celeron 2002E  vs
1037U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L3 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 1.8 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 900 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Celeron 2002E
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1037U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus