Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 2000E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 2000E

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.67 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 2000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 2000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP 2000+ vs the Intel Celeron 2000E.

Features Key features of the Celeron 2000E  vs Athlon XP 2000+ 

clock speed

Celeron 2000E
2.2 GHz
Athlon XP 2000+
1.67 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 2000E  vs
Athlon XP 2000+ 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1.67 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron 2000E  vs
Athlon XP 2000+ 
Threads 2 1
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 30.06W N/A
Intel Celeron 2000E
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 2000+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus