0 Comments
| Intel Celeron 1037U vs 1017U |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 1037U vs the 1017U. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 1017U vs the 1037U. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1037U vs 1017U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron 1037U
3.03 mHash/s
Celeron 1017U
3.69 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron 1037U
79.08 fps
Celeron 1017U
77.07 fps
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron 1037U
0.39 fps
Celeron 1017U
0.38 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 1037U
2,571
Celeron 1017U
2,290
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 1037U
1,468
Celeron 1017U
1,321
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 1037U
94,750 MB/s
Celeron 1017U
84,150 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron 1037U
1,733
Celeron 1017U
1,557
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron 1037U
952
Celeron 1017U
853
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 1037U | vs | 1017U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 5.02 pt/W | 4.56 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Celeron 1037U | vs | 1017U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Celeron 1037U ![]() | Intel Celeron 1017U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
1037U vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $225 | |
1037U vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $72 | |
1037U vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $47 | |
1037U vs D2550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $134 | |
1037U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $75 | |
1037U vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $80 | |
1017U vs 3110M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||