Intel Celeron 1037U vs 1007U |
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron 1037U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
6.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron 1037U
 | Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz | | More l2 cache 1 MB |
| | Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | | Better performance per dollar 3.65 pt/$ |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1037U vs 1007U
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better performance per dollar | 3.65 pt/$ | vs | 3.08 pt/$ | Around 20% better performance per dollar | |||
| Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 953 | vs | 818 | More than 15% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 1007U vs the 1037U. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1037U vs 1007U
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 1037U | vs | 1007U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Celeron 1037U | vs | 1007U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 18 | 15 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 16.12 pt/W | 13.57 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Celeron 1037U  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 1007U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $75 | |
| 3217U vs 1007U | ||
 | VS | |
| $132 | $75 | |
| N2815 vs 1007U | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | ||
| N2830 vs 1007U | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | ||
| 2100 vs 1007U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $75 | |
| J1900 vs 1037U | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | $75 | |
| J1800 vs 1037U | ||
| | VS | |
| $225 | $75 | |
| 3217U vs 1037U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $329 | $313 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $340 | $313 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $195 | $313 | |
| 4790 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $378 | ||
| 4700MQ vs 5750M | ||
 | VS |  |
| $235 | $180 | |
| 4670K vs 8350 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $393 | $281 | |
| 4500U vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 4200M vs 4200U | ||
