0 Comments
| Intel Celeron 1037U vs 1007U |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 1037U vs the 1007U. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 1007U vs the 1037U. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1037U vs 1007U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron 1037U
3.03 mHash/s
Celeron 1007U
3.71 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron 1037U
0.39 fps
Celeron 1007U
0.33 fps
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
Celeron 1037U
1,508
Celeron 1007U
1,496
Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark
Celeron 1037U
859
Celeron 1007U
851
Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark
Celeron 1037U
1,936
Celeron 1007U
1,732
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 1037U
2,571
Celeron 1007U
2,141
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 1037U
1,468
Celeron 1007U
1,245
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 1037U
94,750 MB/s
Celeron 1007U
78,500 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 1037U | vs | 1007U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 5.02 pt/W | 4.38 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Celeron 1037U | vs | 1007U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 18 | 15 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Celeron 1037U ![]() | Intel Celeron 1007U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $75 | |
3217U vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
J1900 vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
1450 vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $75 | |
847 vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
J1900 vs 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $75 | |
3217U vs 1037U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $75 | |
J1800 vs 1037U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||