Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1037U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1037U

Report a correction
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Jun, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Supports more RAM 32,768 MB vs 4,096 MB Supports 8x more RAM
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,468 vs 432 Around 3.5x better geekbench 3 single core score
Significantly better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,903 vs 891 Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,571 vs 1,038 Around 2.5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better performance per dollar 1.41 pt/$ vs 0.62 pt/$ More than 2.2x better performance per dollar
Front view of Intel Atom D525

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D525

Report a correction
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower typical power consumption 10.56W vs 13.81W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.12 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower annual home energy cost 3.13 $/year vs 4.1 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1037U vs Atom D525

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D525
1,038

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1037U
94,750 MB/s
Atom D525
28,100 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom D525
1,010

GeekBench

Atom D525
1,659

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1037U  vs
Atom D525 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 17W 13W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 3.13 $/year
Performance per watt 6.21 pt/W 3.01 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 10.56W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 2,500 MT/s

details

Celeron 1037U  vs
Atom D525 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.12 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 2.12 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Integrated

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3-800
DDR2-800
DDR2-667
DDR2
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 4,096 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U
Report a correction
Intel Atom D525
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus