Intel Celeron 1037U vs Atom D525 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron 1037U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron 1037U
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom D525 vs the Celeron 1037U. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1037U vs Atom D525
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 1037U | vs | Atom D525 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 13W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 3.13 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 5.02 pt/W | 2.62 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 10.56W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 2,500 MT/s | |
details | Celeron 1037U | vs | Atom D525 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.12 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.8 GHz | 2.12 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Integrated | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR2-800 | |||
| DDR2-667 | |||
| DDR2 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 4,096 MB | |
 Intel Celeron 1037U  Report a correction |  Intel Atom D525 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $75 | |
| J1900 vs 1037U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $75 | |
| 3217U vs 1037U | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | $75 | |
| J1800 vs 1037U | ||
 | VS | |
| $47 | $75 | |
| D2550 vs 1037U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $47 | $63 | |
| D2550 vs D525 | ||
| | VS | |
| $82 | $63 | |
| J1900 vs D525 | ||
| | VS | |
| $225 | $63 | |
| 3217U vs D525 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
