Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1037U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1037U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 1900+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 1900+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP 1900+ vs the Intel Celeron 1037U.

Features Key features of the Celeron 1037U  vs Athlon XP 1900+ 

clock speed

Celeron 1037U
1.8 GHz
Athlon XP 1900+
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1037U  vs
Athlon XP 1900+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron 1037U  vs
Athlon XP 1900+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 13.81W N/A
Intel Celeron 1037U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 1900+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus