CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1037U vs 5350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1037U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1037U

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 4.01 mPixels/s vs 3.5 mPixels/s Around 15% better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 90 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,468 vs 1,129 More than 30% better geekbench 3 single core score
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 20.31W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 6.02 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 21.9 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 5350

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 5350

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 4.01 pt/$ vs 1.14 pt/$ More than 3.5x better performance per dollar
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.05 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 600 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 70% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better performance per watt 9.61 pt/W vs 5.02 pt/W More than 90% better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.59 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,639 vs 2,571 More than 40% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.81 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Dec, 2013 vs Jan, 2013 Release date 11 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1037U vs Athlon 5350

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1037U
3.03 mHash/s
Athlon 5350
19 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1037U
0.39 fps
Athlon 5350
0.29 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1037U
94,750 MB/s
Athlon 5350
1,010,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1037U  vs
Athlon 5350 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.05 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
BGA 1023
FS1b

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 25W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 5.02 pt/W 9.61 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 20.31W

details

Celeron 1037U  vs
Athlon 5350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2.81 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 2.59 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8400
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 600 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Intel Celeron 1037U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 5350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus