CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1037U vs 5150 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1037U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1037U

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 94,750 MB/s vs 819.5 MB/s More than 115.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 70 °C 50% higher Maximum operating temperature
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Better performance per watt 5 pt/W vs 3.7 pt/W More than 35% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD Athlon 5150

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 5150

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher GPU clock speed 600 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 70% higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Dec, 2013 vs Jan, 2013 Release date 11 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1037U vs Athlon 5150

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1037U
3.03 mHash/s
Athlon 5150
15.54 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1037U
0.39 fps
Athlon 5150
0.36 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1037U
94,750 MB/s
Athlon 5150
819.5 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1037U  vs
Athlon 5150 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
BGA 1023
FS1b

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE Family
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s

details

Celeron 1037U  vs
Athlon 5150 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 70°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8400
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 600 MHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 25W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 6.02 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 21.9 $/year
Performance per watt 5 pt/W 3.7 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 20.31W
Intel Celeron 1037U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 5150
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus