Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron 1017U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron 1017U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1017U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1017U

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 350 MHz vs 200 MHz 75% higher GPU clock speed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 26.8 vs 19.9 Around 35% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Front view of Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 279,050 MB/s vs 84,150 MB/s More than 3.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 3.42 fps vs -1 fps Around 450% better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score
Newer Apr, 2015 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per dollar 0.73 pt/$ vs 0.52 pt/$ Around 40% better performance per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1017U vs Atom x5 x5-Z8300

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1017U
3.69 mHash/s
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
5.83 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1017U
77.07 fps
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
62.92 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1017U
0.38 fps
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
0.41 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1017U
84,150 MB/s
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
279,050 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1017U  vs
Atom x5 x5-Z8300 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.44 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

Typical power consumption 13.81W N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 2,048 MB

details

Celeron 1017U  vs
Atom x5 x5-Z8300 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.44 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 1.53 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 200 MHz

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron 1017U
Report a correction
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus