CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1017U vs Z3735F among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Atom Z3735F 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Atom Z3735F  based on its features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1017U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1017U

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 1017U vs the Atom Z3735F.

Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom Z3735F vs the Celeron 1017U.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1017U vs Atom Z3735F

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1017U
84,150 MB/s
Atom Z3735F
279,850 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1017U  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.33 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 2.2W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 0.53 $/year
Performance per watt 4.55 pt/W 60.91 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 1.79W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron 1017U  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.63 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 1.63 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 311 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 646 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
DDR3RS-1333
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 2,048 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3735F
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus