Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1017U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1017U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 95 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon 64 X2 3000+ vs the Intel Celeron 1017U.

Features Key features of the Celeron 1017U  vs Athlon 64 X2 3000+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1017U  vs
Athlon 64 X2 3000+ 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron 1017U  vs
Athlon 64 X2 3000+ 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 95°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 20W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 4.82 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 17.52 $/year
Typical power consumption 13.81W 16.25W
Intel Celeron 1017U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3000+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus