Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1007U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1007U

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1.5 GHz vs 0.6 GHz 2.5x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz vs 0.6 GHz More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Nov, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz vs 0.6 GHz 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom E625CT

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E625CT

Report a correction
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 5.69W vs 13.81W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 1.69 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 6.13 $/year vs 14.89 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron 1007U  vs Atom E625CT 

clock speed

Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz
Atom E625CT
0.6 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron 1007U
0.5 MB
Atom E625CT
0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz
Atom E625CT
0.6 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz
Atom E625CT
0.6 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1007U  vs
Atom E625CT 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 0.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron 1007U  vs
Atom E625CT 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 0.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 0.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 0.6 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 7W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 1.69 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 6.13 $/year
Typical power consumption 13.81W 5.69W
Intel Celeron 1007U
Report a correction
Intel Atom E625CT
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus