Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1007U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1007U

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron 1007U vs the AMD Turion 64 technology MT-28.

Front view of AMD Turion 64 technology MT-28

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-28

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion 64 technology MT-28 vs the Intel Celeron 1007U.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1007U vs Turion 64 technology MT-28

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1007U  vs
Turion 64 technology MT-28 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
754

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Celeron 1007U  vs
Turion 64 technology MT-28 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 95°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 2.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 2.14 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 25W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 6.02 $/year
Performance per watt 4.38 pt/W 0.68 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 20.31W
Intel Celeron 1007U
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 technology MT-28
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus