0 Comments
| Intel Celeron 1007U vs AMD Sempron PCs M100 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron 1007U
- 1.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron 1007U
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Sempron PCs M100 vs the Intel Celeron 1007U. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1007U vs Sempron PCs M100
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 1007U
2,141
Sempron PCs M100
934
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 1007U
1,245
Sempron PCs M100
934
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron 1007U
78,500 MB/s
Sempron PCs M100
79,200 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron 1007U
1,399
Sempron PCs M100
554
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron 1007U
818
Sempron PCs M100
608
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 1007U | vs | Sempron PCs M100 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
S1 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 4.38 pt/W | 2.56 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 20.31W |
details | Celeron 1007U | vs | Sempron PCs M100 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.02 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 2.02 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | N/A |
Intel Celeron 1007U ![]() | AMD Sempron PCs M100 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $225 | |
1007U vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
1007U vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
1007U vs 1450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $134 | |
1007U vs 2117U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $134 | |
1007U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
1007U vs N2830 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $107 | |
1007U vs N2840 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||