Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1007U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1007U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 69.31W 5x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 71 °C Around 50% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jan, 2013 vs May, 2004 Release date over 8 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 20.55 $/year 5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 74.72 $/year 5x lower annual commercial energy cost
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Opteron 846

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 846

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Celeron 1007U  vs Opteron 846 

clock speed

Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz
Opteron 846
2 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz
Opteron 846
2 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz
Opteron 846
2 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1007U  vs
Opteron 846 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
940

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron 1007U  vs
Opteron 846 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 8
Clock multiplier 15 10
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C 0 - 71°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 2 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 85.3W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 20.55 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 74.72 $/year
Typical power consumption 13.81W 69.31W
Intel Celeron 1007U
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 846
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus