CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1007U vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron 1007U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 1007U  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron 1007U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron 1007U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1007U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1007U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better PCMark 8 home 3.0 accelerated score 1,496 vs 1,106 More than 35% better PCMark 8 home 3.0 accelerated score
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 90 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better PassMark (Single core) score 818 vs 429 More than 90% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better cloud gate score 1,732 vs 1,175 More than 45% better cloud gate score
Lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 30.2W 2.2x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,610 vs 1,021 Around 60% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 12 $/year 2.9x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 28.21 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 492 MHz vs 350 MHz More than 40% higher GPU clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1007U vs E 350

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1007U
3.71 mHash/s
E 350
7.51 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1007U
0.33 fps
E 350
0.1 fps

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

E 350
1,106

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

E 350
1,175

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E 350
620

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1007U
78,500 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1007U  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 18W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 5.5 pt/W 1.87 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 30.2W

details

Celeron 1007U  vs
E 350 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 8
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6310
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 492 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Intel Celeron 1007U
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus