Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1007U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1007U

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 40 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 30.2W 2.2x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum Operating Temperature 105 °C vs 90 °C More than 15% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Better performance per watt 14.01 pt/W vs 4.24 pt/W More than 3.2x better performance per watt
Marginally newer Jan, 2013 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 12 $/year 2.9x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Celeron 1007U  vs E 350 

clock speed

Celeron 1007U
1.5 GHz
E 350
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

E 350
1 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1007U  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 18W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 12 $/year
Performance per watt 14.01 pt/W 4.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 30.2W

details

Celeron 1007U  vs
E 350 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 40 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 90°C

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6310
Intel Celeron 1007U
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus