Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1007U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1007U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 78,500 MB/s vs 71,200 MB/s More than 10% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 80 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 4.38 pt/W vs 2.97 pt/W More than 45% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD Athlon II 160u

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II 160u

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.08 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1007U vs Athlon II 160u

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1007U
78,500 MB/s
Athlon II 160u
71,200 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1007U  vs
Athlon II 160u 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron 1007U  vs
Athlon II 160u 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 80°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 3.08 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 3.08 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 20W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 4.82 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 17.52 $/year
Performance per watt 4.38 pt/W 2.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 16.25W
Intel Celeron 1007U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II 160u
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus