0 Comments
| Intel Celeron 1005M vs AMD Turion II M560 |
Released July, 2013
Intel Celeron 1005M
- 1.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron 1005M
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion II M560 vs the Intel Celeron 1005M. | |||||||
Features Key features of the Celeron 1005M vs Turion II M560
clock speed
Celeron 1005M
1.9 GHz
Turion II M560
2.5 GHz
L2 cache
Celeron 1005M
0.5 MB
Turion II M560
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Celeron 1005M
1.9 GHz
Turion II M560
2.5 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Celeron 1005M
1.9 GHz
Turion II M560
2.5 GHz
TDP
Celeron 1005M
35W
Turion II M560
35W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron 1005M | vs | Turion II M560 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 35W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 28.44W | 28.44W |
details | Celeron 1005M | vs | Turion II M560 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | N/A |
Intel Celeron 1005M ![]() | AMD Turion II M560 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $75 | |
380M vs 1005M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $75 | |
2020M vs 1005M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
N2830 vs 1005M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $75 | |
3110M vs 1005M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $75 | |
1007U vs 1005M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$246 | $75 | |
B960 vs 1005M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
2100 vs 1005M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||