CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1000M vs 2372 HE among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron 1000M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 1000M  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1000M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1000M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 55 °C More than 90% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 44.69W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,424 vs 1,000 Around 2.5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Jan, 2009 Release date over 4 years later
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,456 vs 1,004.5 Around 45% better geekbench 3 single core score
Better performance per watt 2.11 pt/W vs 0.62 pt/W Around 3.5x better performance per watt
Lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 13.25 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 48.18 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 2372 HE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2372 HE

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 2 MB 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1000M vs Opteron 2372 HE

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1000M
93,900 MB/s
Opteron 2372 HE
78.7 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1000M  vs
Opteron 2372 HE 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
F

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 55W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 48.18 $/year
Performance per watt 2.11 pt/W 0.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 44.69W

details

Celeron 1000M  vs
Opteron 2372 HE 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 2
Clock multiplier 18 10
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 2.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

bus

Clock speed 100 MHz 2,000 MHz
Intel Celeron 1000M
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2372 HE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus