Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1000M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1000M

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron 1000M vs the AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+.

Front view of AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ vs the Intel Celeron 1000M.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1000M vs K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1000M  vs
K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
462
754

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 100 MHz 266 MHz

details

Celeron 1000M  vs
K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 95°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.97 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 1.97 GHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 62W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 14.94 $/year
Performance per watt 2.11 pt/W 0.63 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 50.38W
Intel Celeron 1000M
Report a correction
AMD K8 Athlon XP-M 3000+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus