CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1000M vs 1800 among laptop CPUs (over 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

2.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron 1000M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron 1000M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron 1000M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1000M

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron 1000M vs the AMD E2 1800.

Front view of AMD E2 1800

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 1800

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD E2 1800 vs the Intel Celeron 1000M.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron 1000M vs E2 1800

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1000M
74.89 fps
E2 1800
53.74 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron 1000M
-1 fps
E2 1800
0.07 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 1800
1,184

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron 1000M
93,900 MB/s
E2 1800
55,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E2 1800
1,093

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron 1000M  vs
E2 1800 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.34 $/year
Performance per watt 2.11 pt/W 2.71 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 14.63W

details

Celeron 1000M  vs
E2 1800 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 18 5
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.72 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 1.72 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 7340
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 523 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 680 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Intel Celeron 1000M
Report a correction
AMD E2 1800
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus