Intel Celeron 1000M vs AMD E2 1800

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Celeron 1000M 2.3 E2 1800 1.3 Core i3 2328M 2.9
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Celeron 1000M 0.9 E2 1800 0.0 Core i3 2328M 1.3
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Celeron 1000M n.d. E2 1800 n.d. Core i3 2328M n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Celeron 1000M 0.0 E2 1800 1.1 Core i3 2328M n.d.
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Celeron 1000M 0.0 E2 1800 0.0 Core i3 2328M 0.0
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Celeron 1000M 4.6 E2 1800 6.6 Core i3 2328M 4.7
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel Celeron 1000M

Front view of Intel Celeron 1000M

Front view of AMD E2 1800

AMD E2 1800

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel Celeron 1000M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1000M

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron 1000M vs the AMD E2 1800.

Front view of AMD E2 1800

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 1800

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD E2 1800 vs the Intel Celeron 1000M.

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

74.89 fps

53.74 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

-1 fps

0.07 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

2,424

1,184

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,456

659

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

93,900 MB/s

55,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

2,375

1,093

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

1,663

822

PassMark (Single Core)

950

448

summary	Celeron 1000M	vs	E2 1800
Clock speed	1.8 GHz		1.7 GHz
Cores	Dual core		Dual core
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
power consumption
TDP	35W		18W
Annual home energy cost	8.43 $/year		4.34 $/year
Performance per watt	2.11 pt/W		2.71 pt/W
Typical power consumption	28.44W		14.63W

details	Celeron 1000M	vs	E2 1800
Threads	2		2
L2 cache	1 MB		1 MB
L2 cache per core	0.5 MB/core		0.5 MB/core
L3 cache	2 MB		0.5 MB
L3 cache per core	1 MB/core		0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process	22 nm		32 nm
Max CPUs	1		1
Clock multiplier	18		5
Operating temperature	Unknown - 105°C		Unknown - 100°C
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	1.8 GHz		1.72 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	1.8 GHz		1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	1.8 GHz		1.72 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU		GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics		Radeon™ HD 7340
GPU clock speed	650 MHz		523 MHz
Turbo clock speed	1,000 MHz		680 MHz
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in		Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3

Intel Celeron 1000M

Report a correction

AMD E2 1800

Report a correction

VS

Intel Celeron 1000M vs Core i3 2328M

VS

AMD E2 1800 vs Intel Core i3 2328M

Comments

comments powered by Disqus