Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Atom x7 x7-Z8700

CPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Intel Atom x7 x7-Z8700
Front view of Intel Atom Z3795

Intel Atom Z3795

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom x7 x7-Z8700

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom x7 x7-Z8700

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 5.37 mPixels/s vs 0.98 mPixels/s Around 5.5x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 4.22 pt/$ vs 3.43 pt/$ Around 25% better performance per dollar
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 23.1 vs 23 Almost the same
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Mar, 2014 Release date 9 months later
Front view of Intel Atom Z3795

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3795

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 391,900 MB/s vs 389,000 MB/s Almost the same
Higher GPU clock speed 311 MHz vs 200 MHz More than 55% higher GPU clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom x7 x7-Z8700 vs Z3795

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Atom x7 x7-Z8700
8.39 mHash/s
Atom Z3795
1.63 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Atom x7 x7-Z8700
5.37 mPixels/s
Atom Z3795
0.98 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Atom x7 x7-Z8700
0.51 fps
Atom Z3795
0.11 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom x7 x7-Z8700
3,246
Atom Z3795
3,062

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom x7 x7-Z8700
966
Atom Z3795
960

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom x7 x7-Z8700
389,000 MB/s
Atom Z3795
391,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Atom x7 x7-Z8700
1,924
Atom Z3795
1,768

PassMark (Single Core)

Atom x7 x7-Z8700
553
Atom Z3795
516

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Atom x7 x7-Z8700  vs
Z3795 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.39 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption
Typical power consumption N/A 1.63W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

 Atom x7 x7-Z8700  vs
Z3795 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 2 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 311 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB
Intel Atom x7 x7-Z8700
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3795
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss