Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300

CPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300
Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Intel Atom Z3735F

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Newer Apr, 2015 vs Apr, 2014 Release date 11 months later
Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 7.87 pt/$ vs 5.42 pt/$ More than 45% better performance per dollar
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Higher GPU clock speed 311 MHz vs 200 MHz More than 55% higher GPU clock speed
Better geekbench 3 AES single core score 279,850 MB/s vs 279,050 MB/s Almost the same
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.83 GHz vs 1.44 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs Z3735F

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom x5 x5-Z8300
2,187
Atom Z3735F
2,148

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom x5 x5-Z8300
761
Atom Z3735F
778

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Atom x5 x5-Z8300
279,050 MB/s
Atom Z3735F
279,850 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Atom x5 x5-Z8300
19.9
Atom Z3735F
21.3

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Atom x5 x5-Z8300
1,204
Atom Z3735F
908

PassMark (Single Core)

Atom x5 x5-Z8300
389
Atom Z3735F
350

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Atom x5 x5-Z8300  vs
Z3735F 
Clock speed 1.44 GHz 1.33 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.84 GHz 1.83 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes No

features
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption
Typical power consumption N/A 1.79W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

 Atom x5 x5-Z8300  vs
Z3735F 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 1.53 GHz 1.63 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.44 GHz 1.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.53 GHz 1.63 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 311 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
DDR3RS-1333
Channels Single Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 2,048 MB 2,048 MB
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3735F
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 7 comments.
ѕкєρтιк (04:51 PM, August 2, 2017)
i still dont get how the test the graph show shows the z3 as better? maybe its something to do with the ram
Kilua (04:28 PM, July 30, 2017)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQujJ1JoUNI
ѕкєρтιк (06:43 PM, July 28, 2017)
can you link me a vid where it shows the z8 chip having a good frame rate in a game
Denver Winner (11:40 PM, September 24, 2016)
Anybody have two tablets with both of these? Any verdict here?
Kilua (04:47 PM, July 24, 2016)
If you watch youtube videos, you can see, the z8300 are much faster in games.
Nextum (12:05 AM, July 7, 2016)
I prefer the Z3735. Runs games faster.
Lance Jones (06:23 PM, March 22, 2016)
The battle of the $100 Windows tablets! It only excites me because of the price point
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss