0 Comments
| Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs S1279 |
Released April, 2015
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300
- 1.44 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | More cores 4 |
VS
Released December, 2012
Intel Atom S1279
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the S1279
![]() | Slightly higher clock speed 1.6 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Newer | Apr, 2015 | vs | Dec, 2012 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Slightly higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.44 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed |
Features Key features of the Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs S1279
clock speed
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
1.44 GHz
Atom S1279
1.6 GHz
L2 cache
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
2 MB
Atom S1279
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
1.53 GHz
Atom S1279
1.6 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
1.44 GHz
Atom S1279
1.6 GHz
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom x5 x5-Z8300 | vs | S1279 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.44 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | N/A | 10.64W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 10,666.66 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 2,048 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | Atom x5 x5-Z8300 | vs | S1279 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.53 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.44 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.53 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 ![]() | Intel Atom S1279 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $21 | |
Z3735F vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | ||
x5-Z8350 vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $21 | |
N3050 vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$27 | $21 | |
x5-Z8500 vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $21 | |
3230M vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$20 | $21 | |
Z3736F vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $21 | |
M3-6Y30 vs x5-Z8300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||