0 Comments
| Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs AMD Athlon XP 2200+ |
Released April, 2015
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300
- 1.44 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Athlon XP 2200+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon XP 2200+
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.23 GHz |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.44 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.23 GHz | vs | 1.53 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.44 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs Athlon XP 2200+
clock speed
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
1.44 GHz
Athlon XP 2200+
1.8 GHz
L2 cache
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
2 MB
Athlon XP 2200+
0.25 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
1.53 GHz
Athlon XP 2200+
2.23 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
1.44 GHz
Athlon XP 2200+
1.8 GHz
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom x5 x5-Z8300 | vs | Athlon XP 2200+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.44 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Single core | |
features | |||
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
MMX | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! |
details | Atom x5 x5-Z8300 | vs | Athlon XP 2200+ |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.25 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.53 GHz | 2.23 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.44 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.53 GHz | 2.23 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | N/A | N/A |
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 ![]() | AMD Athlon XP 2200+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $21 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs x5 x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | ||
Intel x5-Z8350 vs Atom x5 x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $21 | |
Intel Celeron N3050 vs Atom x5 x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$27 | $21 | |
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8500 vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$20 | $21 | |
Intel Atom Z3736F vs x5 x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $21 | |
Intel Core i5 3230M vs Atom x5 x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $21 | |
Intel Core M3-6Y30 vs Atom x5 x5-Z8300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||