Intel Atom Z510P vs E3845 |
Released March, 2009
Intel Atom Z510P
- 1.1 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Atom Z510P
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Atom E3845
- 1.91 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the E3845
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Atom Z510P vs E3845
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Atom Z510P | vs | E3845 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.91 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 437 | |||
| BGA 1170 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 2.2W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 0.53 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 1.79W | 8.13W | |
details | Atom Z510P | vs | E3845 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.92 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 1.91 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.1 GHz | 1.92 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | HD | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 542 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 792 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Atom Z510P  Report a correction |  Intel Atom E3845 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $52 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom E3845 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $52 | |
| Intel Celeron N2807 vs Atom E3845 | ||
 | VS | |
| $52 | ||
| Intel J3160 vs Atom E3845 | ||
 | VS | |
| $52 | ||
| Intel E3940 vs Atom E3845 | ||
 | VS | |
| $155 | $52 | |
| Intel Celeron N2930 vs Atom E3845 | ||
 | VS | |
| $52 | ||
| Intel E3950 vs Atom E3845 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $52 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Atom E3845 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
